大象传媒

Despite the strained relationship between ghosts and scientific ideals of truth and verifiability it is not hard to find examples of what can be called 鈥渁cademic urban legends鈥�: untrue or unverifiable claims and stories which are circulating in scientific publications, sometimes for decades, without being debunked or questioned.

Watch the keynote on聽.

The explanation behind the paradox is often a widespread unwillingness or inability to consult primary sources. The digital revolution has made the task of finding and consulting a wide range of primary sources immensely easier. However, despite the blessings of enormous digital archives and databases, academic urban legends continue to proliferate and ghosts are appearing in new and unexpected forms, such as 鈥済host references鈥� and 鈥済host statistics.鈥�

The spread of false knowledge in scientific disguise, sometimes with disastrous consequences, is facilitated by a questionable academic practice that is both time saving and hard or impossible to expose: pretending to have consulted primary sources by copying, or rather plagiarizing, citations from others.

is an anthropologist and professor at Western Norway University of Applied Sciences. He has studied how urban legends and myths are born and sometimes get an undeserved life as scientific facts and reliable knowledge. Rekdal鈥檚 contributions on the topic include鈥�,鈥�, and ? A on academic citation practices and use of sources.